In 2007 local Lake Tahoe residents: Ann Nichols, Margaret Eadington, Coleman Munch, Scott Tieche and Carol Buck formed the C4 Non-Profit, North Tahoe Preservation Alliance (NTPA). At that time, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) had rolled out the Community Enhancement Program (CEP) which promoted new commercial/residential development by allowing extra height and density. The TRPA rationalized that by incentivizing more development these projects would finally complete water quality projects that would ultimately benefit Lake Tahoe clarity.
One of the CEP enrollees was the Boulder Bay project located in Crystal Bay, Nevada. The originally proposed project was massive with over 800,000 sq.ft. of buildout reaching heights of 85’. Where once there was a 110 room Biltmore Hotel, now over 350 units were proposed. Unbelievably, the project claimed it would reduce traffic. The relatively small Crystal Bay commercial area is surrounded by residential homes some of which were built in the beginning of the 1900’s. Additionally, the project included the taking of part of Wassou Rd. and all of Reservoir Rd., which are two main exits from the Crystal Bay neighborhood.
The Boulder Bay project was approved in 2012, but the maximum heights were reduced to 75’ and NTPA was central to preserving the third exit from the neighborhood…to be renamed Wellness Way.
Fast forward to 2018, the Boulder Bay project is in the process of building their first phase- 18 condos priced from $1.6m to over $2m on the site of a previous public park. The water quality improvements have been only partially completed and the balance of the site is still blighted with rusted equipment strewn about and dilapidated abandoned buildings.
In 2013, Sierra Pacific Industries and Mountainside Partners proposed the development of 760 single family homes on 670 acres at the top of the ridge overlooking Lake Tahoe and Truckee one mile west of Hwy 267 and continuing for a mile towards the Northstar Resort ski area. Although denied by the Placer County Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors approved the project in 2016. Litigation was filed by the California Clean Energy Committee (CCEC) and separately by the League to Save Lake Tahoe/Mountain Area Preservation/Sierra Watch (LMS). The League/Mountain Area Preservation/Sierra Watch prevailed on the basis that evacuation for fire was inadequately addressed. In October, 2018 both LMS and CCEC have filed an appeal on their other areas of concern.
We’ve driven this change by convincing others Lake Tahoe is worth conserving.The ultimate aim is simple: to build a future in which people live in harmony with Lake Tahoe.
Ann Nichols, President
First Step
Second Step
Third Step